Strange and relative thinking: two examples

On Infinity and Boundaries: You have to understand that if you have an infinite "expanse" of sameness that is unchanging, and that you (I say ‘you’, but I mean ‘it’ or ‘unknown’ for the time being) cause a Thing to exist from that sameness, if it is to ‘exist’, then it must necessarily be perfectly…

The Universe as an Analog Circuit

We intuitively describe an object's 'tendency' to remain as it is, in terms of how it was before. Talking of Time and memory, we perceive the past, but in a physically objective world outside of us, if everything is transformations, then Time is bogus - illusory. We only perceive it as a 'rate of change',…

The Present is “Not” – a Transformation Ontology

When you think about transformations, how they exist 'en soi' (they are, independent of origin or basis) because to exist is to be different, and to be different is to transform (or be a transformation), and given that Matter is, ultimately, Immaterial 'Energy' - which is just another word for transformation (even 'potential' energy is…

Time and Change

Stop. Stop every single thing. Freeze. Freeze Time itself. For us, as humans, we wouldn't be able to see anything because the photons have stopped and therefore aren't reaching our retinas, but even more, our own neurons have stopped. That doesn't mean nothing exists absolutely - Everything still is, just frozen - but it does…

Back to Physics

While it is fun to philosophize and make stuff up about "Wu” and zero-dimensional reflections, at some point, this has to tie-back to ‘real’ reality – the actual, physical world of physics and matter. I mean, seriously, what is this ‘zero-dimensional Reflection’ I keep talking about? How can a reflection be ‘of itself’? Firstly, starting…

A Breakthrough?

If you've read along this far, you'll have noticed how mercurial these matters can be. And, like mercury, madness isn't that far away... Well, I feel like I've hit something with such resonating truth, such obvious obviousness, that I know this is it! Now, to extract it while avoiding insanity is the hardest part -…

A whole lotta Nothing

I introduced the notion of "Wu" quite superficially and off-handedly in my first article Ex Sistere and then said no more about it, other than my position that "Wu" is the before-the-big-bang. But that's bad form. In truth, I wanted to get on to other concepts. Now it's time to look at things again and…

Numbers?

Difference being discrete, and our definition of Existence (as opposed to the more unattainable "Wu"), then, can be counted. In my first post I said "Wu" was zero. Well, the first difference from Wu is one, so we could write: 0-1=-1 But 'negative one' is just a place holder, an expression of the absence of…